0.05/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.05/0.11 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hfE27vnFqM true 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.15/0.31 % CPULimit : 960 0.15/0.31 % WCLimit : 120 0.15/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 05:02:09 EDT 2022 0.15/0.31 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.31 % Running portfolio for 960 s 0.15/0.31 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.15/0.31 % Number of cores: 8 0.15/0.31 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.15/0.32 % Running in HO mode 0.46/0.60 % Total configuration time : 828 0.46/0.60 % Estimated wc time : 1656 0.46/0.60 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0 0.48/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s 0.48/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s 0.48/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s 0.48/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s 0.48/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s 0.48/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s 0.48/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s 0.48/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s 0.50/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 90s 0.50/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif.sh running for 56s 28.69/4.20 % Solved by lams/15_e_short1.sh. 28.69/4.20 % running E: timeout 11 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/eprover-ho --pos-ext=all --neg-ext=all /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hfE27vnFqM/e_inputb045fb --cpu-limit=9 --auto-schedule -s -p 28.69/4.20 % done 92 iterations in 3.441s 28.69/4.20 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 28.69/4.20 % SZS output start Refutation 28.69/4.20 thf(reg_type, type, reg: $tType). 28.69/4.20 thf(spain_type, type, spain: reg). 28.69/4.20 thf(tpp_type, type, tpp: reg > reg > $o). 28.69/4.20 thf(paris_type, type, paris: reg). 28.69/4.20 thf(ec_type, type, ec: reg > reg > $o). 28.69/4.20 thf(a_type, type, a: $i > $i > $o). 28.69/4.20 thf(p_type, type, p: reg > reg > $o). 28.69/4.20 thf(catalunya_type, type, catalunya: reg). 28.69/4.20 thf(mvalid_type, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o). 28.69/4.20 thf(o_type, type, o: reg > reg > $o). 28.69/4.20 thf(mbox_type, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 28.69/4.20 thf(c_type, type, c: reg > reg > $o). 28.69/4.20 thf(france_type, type, france: reg). 28.69/4.20 thf(pp_type, type, pp: reg > reg > $o). 28.69/4.20 thf(ntpp_type, type, ntpp: reg > reg > $o). 28.69/4.20 thf(ntpp, axiom,(( ntpp ) = 28.69/4.20 (^[X:reg,Y:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( pp @ X @ Y ) & ( ~( ?[Z:reg]: ( ( ec @ Z @ Y ) & ( ec @ Z @ X ) ) ) ) )))). 28.69/4.20 thf(ec, axiom,(( ec ) = 28.69/4.20 (^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ( c @ X @ Y ) & ( ~( o @ X @ Y ) ) )))). 28.69/4.20 thf(o, axiom,(( o ) = 28.69/4.20 (^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ?[Z:reg]: ( ( p @ Z @ Y ) & ( p @ Z @ X ) ) )))). 28.69/4.20 thf(p, axiom,(( p ) = 28.69/4.20 (^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ![Z:reg]: ( ( c @ Z @ X ) => ( c @ Z @ Y ) ) )))). 28.69/4.20 thf('0', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( p ) = 28.69/4.20 ( ^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ![Z:reg]: ( ( c @ Z @ X ) => ( c @ Z @ Y ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [p])). 28.69/4.20 thf('1', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( p ) = 28.69/4.20 ( ^[V_1:reg,V_2:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ![X4:reg]: ( ( c @ X4 @ V_1 ) => ( c @ X4 @ V_2 ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 define([status(thm)])). 28.69/4.20 thf('2', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( o ) = 28.69/4.20 ( ^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ?[Z:reg]: ( ( p @ Z @ Y ) & ( p @ Z @ X ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [o, '1'])). 28.69/4.20 thf('3', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( o ) = 28.69/4.20 ( ^[V_1:reg,V_2:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ?[X4:reg]: ( ( p @ X4 @ V_2 ) & ( p @ X4 @ V_1 ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 define([status(thm)])). 28.69/4.20 thf('4', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( ec ) = ( ^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ( c @ X @ Y ) & ( ~( o @ X @ Y ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [ec, '3', '1'])). 28.69/4.20 thf('5', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( ec ) = 28.69/4.20 ( ^[V_1:reg,V_2:reg]: ( ( c @ V_1 @ V_2 ) & ( ~( o @ V_1 @ V_2 ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 define([status(thm)])). 28.69/4.20 thf('6', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( ntpp ) = 28.69/4.20 ( ^[X:reg,Y:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( pp @ X @ Y ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ~( ?[Z:reg]: ( ( ec @ Z @ Y ) & ( ec @ Z @ X ) ) ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [ntpp, '5', '3', '1'])). 28.69/4.20 thf('7', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( ntpp ) = 28.69/4.20 ( ^[V_1:reg,V_2:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( pp @ V_1 @ V_2 ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ~( ?[X4:reg]: ( ( ec @ X4 @ V_2 ) & ( ec @ X4 @ V_1 ) ) ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 define([status(thm)])). 28.69/4.20 thf(pp, axiom,(( pp ) = 28.69/4.20 (^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ( p @ X @ Y ) & ( ~( p @ Y @ X ) ) )))). 28.69/4.20 thf('8', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( pp ) = ( ^[X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ( p @ X @ Y ) & ( ~( p @ Y @ X ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [pp, '1'])). 28.69/4.20 thf('9', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( pp ) = 28.69/4.20 ( ^[V_1:reg,V_2:reg]: ( ( p @ V_1 @ V_2 ) & ( ~( p @ V_2 @ V_1 ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 define([status(thm)])). 28.69/4.20 thf(mvalid, axiom,(( mvalid ) = 28.69/4.20 (^[Phi:( $i > $o )]: ( ![W:$i]: ( Phi @ W ) )))). 28.69/4.20 thf('10', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( mvalid ) = ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o )]: ( ![W:$i]: ( Phi @ W ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mvalid])). 28.69/4.20 thf('11', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( mvalid ) = ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o )]: ( ![X4:$i]: ( V_1 @ X4 ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 define([status(thm)])). 28.69/4.20 thf(mbox, axiom,(( mbox ) = 28.69/4.20 (^[R:( $i > $i > $o ),Phi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: 28.69/4.20 ( ![V:$i]: ( ( Phi @ V ) | ( ~( R @ W @ V ) ) ) )))). 28.69/4.20 thf('12', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( mbox ) = 28.69/4.20 ( ^[R:( $i > $i > $o ),Phi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: 28.69/4.20 ( ![V:$i]: ( ( Phi @ V ) | ( ~( R @ W @ V ) ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mbox])). 28.69/4.20 thf('13', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( mbox ) = 28.69/4.20 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o ),V_3:$i]: 28.69/4.20 ( ![X4:$i]: ( ( V_2 @ X4 ) | ( ~( V_1 @ V_3 @ X4 ) ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 define([status(thm)])). 28.69/4.20 thf(ax3, axiom, 28.69/4.20 (mvalid @ ( mbox @ a @ ( ^[X:$i]: ( ntpp @ paris @ france ) ) ))). 28.69/4.20 thf(zf_stmt_0, axiom, 28.69/4.20 (![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ~( a @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | 28.69/4.20 ( ( ~( ?[X12:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ~( ?[X20:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ![X24:reg]: ( ( c @ X24 @ X20 ) => ( c @ X24 @ X12 ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ![X22:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( c @ X22 @ X20 ) => ( c @ X22 @ paris ) ) ) ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( c @ X12 @ paris ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ~( ?[X14:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ![X18:reg]: ( ( c @ X18 @ X14 ) => ( c @ X18 @ X12 ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ![X16:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( c @ X16 @ X14 ) => ( c @ X16 @ france ) ) ) ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( c @ X12 @ france ) ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ~( ![X10:reg]: ( ( c @ X10 @ france ) => ( c @ X10 @ paris ) ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ![X8:reg]: ( ( c @ X8 @ paris ) => ( c @ X8 @ france ) ) ) ) ))). 28.69/4.20 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, 28.69/4.20 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 28.69/4.20 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: 28.69/4.20 (((((~) @ (a @ Y0 @ Y1))) | 28.69/4.20 (((((~) @ (((??) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (((((~) @ (((??) @ ( 28.69/4.20 ^[Y3 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( 28.69/4.20 ( 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (!!) @ ( 28.69/4.20 ^[Y4 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ 28.69/4.20 Y3) => 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ Y2)))))) & 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (!!) @ ( 28.69/4.20 ^[Y4 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ 28.69/4.20 Y3) => 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ 28.69/4.20 paris))))))))))))) & 28.69/4.20 (c @ Y2 @ paris) & 28.69/4.20 (((~) @ (((??) @ ( 28.69/4.20 ^[Y3 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( 28.69/4.20 ( 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (!!) @ ( 28.69/4.20 ^[Y4 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ 28.69/4.20 Y3) => 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ Y2)))))) & 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (!!) @ ( 28.69/4.20 ^[Y4 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ 28.69/4.20 Y3) => 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ 28.69/4.20 france))))))))))))) & 28.69/4.20 (c @ Y2 @ france)))))))) & 28.69/4.20 (((~) @ (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (((c @ Y2 @ france) => 28.69/4.20 (c @ Y2 @ paris)))))))) & 28.69/4.20 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (((c @ Y2 @ paris) => (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y2 @ france))))))))))))))))), 28.69/4.20 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 28.69/4.20 thf(tpp, axiom,(( tpp ) = 28.69/4.20 (^[X:reg,Y:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( pp @ X @ Y ) & ( ?[Z:reg]: ( ( ec @ Z @ Y ) & ( ec @ Z @ X ) ) ) )))). 28.69/4.20 thf('14', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( tpp ) = 28.69/4.20 ( ^[X:reg,Y:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( pp @ X @ Y ) & ( ?[Z:reg]: ( ( ec @ Z @ Y ) & ( ec @ Z @ X ) ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [tpp, '5', '3', '1'])). 28.69/4.20 thf('15', plain, 28.69/4.20 (( tpp ) = 28.69/4.20 ( ^[V_1:reg,V_2:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( pp @ V_1 @ V_2 ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ?[X4:reg]: ( ( ec @ X4 @ V_2 ) & ( ec @ X4 @ V_1 ) ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 define([status(thm)])). 28.69/4.20 thf(ax1, axiom, 28.69/4.20 (mvalid @ ( mbox @ a @ ( ^[X:$i]: ( tpp @ catalunya @ spain ) ) ))). 28.69/4.20 thf(zf_stmt_1, axiom, 28.69/4.20 (![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ~( a @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | 28.69/4.20 ( ( ?[X12:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ~( ?[X20:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ![X24:reg]: ( ( c @ X24 @ X20 ) => ( c @ X24 @ X12 ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ![X22:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( c @ X22 @ X20 ) => ( c @ X22 @ catalunya ) ) ) ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( c @ X12 @ catalunya ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ~( ?[X14:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ![X18:reg]: ( ( c @ X18 @ X14 ) => ( c @ X18 @ X12 ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ![X16:reg]: ( ( c @ X16 @ X14 ) => ( c @ X16 @ spain ) ) ) ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( c @ X12 @ spain ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ~( ![X10:reg]: ( ( c @ X10 @ spain ) => ( c @ X10 @ catalunya ) ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ![X8:reg]: ( ( c @ X8 @ catalunya ) => ( c @ X8 @ spain ) ) ) ) ))). 28.69/4.20 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, 28.69/4.20 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 28.69/4.20 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: 28.69/4.20 (((((~) @ (a @ Y0 @ Y1))) | 28.69/4.20 (((((??) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (((((~) @ (((??) @ (^[Y3 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( 28.69/4.20 ( 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (!!) @ ( 28.69/4.20 ^[Y4 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ 28.69/4.20 Y3) => 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ Y2)))))) & 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (!!) @ ( 28.69/4.20 ^[Y4 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ 28.69/4.20 Y3) => 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ 28.69/4.20 catalunya))))))))))))) & 28.69/4.20 (c @ Y2 @ catalunya) & 28.69/4.20 (((~) @ (((??) @ (^[Y3 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( 28.69/4.20 ( 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (!!) @ ( 28.69/4.20 ^[Y4 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ 28.69/4.20 Y3) => 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ Y2)))))) & 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (!!) @ ( 28.69/4.20 ^[Y4 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (( 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ 28.69/4.20 Y3) => 28.69/4.20 (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y4 @ 28.69/4.20 spain))))))))))))) & 28.69/4.20 (c @ Y2 @ spain)))))) & 28.69/4.20 (((~) @ (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (((c @ Y2 @ spain) => 28.69/4.20 (c @ Y2 @ catalunya)))))))) & 28.69/4.20 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (((c @ Y2 @ catalunya) => (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y2 @ spain))))))))))))))))), 28.69/4.20 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 28.69/4.20 thf(c_symmetric, axiom, (![X:reg,Y:reg]: ( ( c @ X @ Y ) => ( c @ Y @ X ) ))). 28.69/4.20 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 28.69/4.20 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ Y1) => (c @ Y1 @ Y0)))))))))), 28.69/4.20 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [c_symmetric])). 28.69/4.20 thf(con, conjecture, 28.69/4.20 (mvalid @ 28.69/4.20 ( mbox @ 28.69/4.20 a @ ( ^[X:$i]: ( ( o @ catalunya @ spain ) & ( o @ france @ paris ) ) ) ))). 28.69/4.20 thf(zf_stmt_2, conjecture, 28.69/4.20 (![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ~( a @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | 28.69/4.20 ( ( ?[X14:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ![X18:reg]: ( ( c @ X18 @ X14 ) => ( c @ X18 @ france ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ![X16:reg]: ( ( c @ X16 @ X14 ) => ( c @ X16 @ paris ) ) ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ?[X8:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ![X12:reg]: ( ( c @ X12 @ X8 ) => ( c @ X12 @ catalunya ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ![X10:reg]: ( ( c @ X10 @ X8 ) => ( c @ X10 @ spain ) ) ) ) ) ) ))). 28.69/4.20 thf(zf_stmt_3, negated_conjecture, 28.69/4.20 (~( ![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ~( a @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | 28.69/4.20 ( ( ?[X14:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ![X18:reg]: ( ( c @ X18 @ X14 ) => ( c @ X18 @ france ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ![X16:reg]: ( ( c @ X16 @ X14 ) => ( c @ X16 @ paris ) ) ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ?[X8:reg]: 28.69/4.20 ( ( ![X12:reg]: ( ( c @ X12 @ X8 ) => ( c @ X12 @ catalunya ) ) ) & 28.69/4.20 ( ![X10:reg]: ( ( c @ X10 @ X8 ) => ( c @ X10 @ spain ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )), 28.69/4.20 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])). 28.69/4.20 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain, 28.69/4.20 (~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 28.69/4.20 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: 28.69/4.20 (((((~) @ (a @ Y0 @ Y1))) | 28.69/4.20 (((((??) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (((((!!) @ (^[Y3 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (((c @ Y3 @ 28.69/4.20 Y2) => (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y3 @ france)))))) & 28.69/4.20 (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (((c @ Y3 @ 28.69/4.20 Y2) => (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y3 @ paris))))))))))) & 28.69/4.20 (((??) @ (^[Y2 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (((((!!) @ (^[Y3 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (((c @ Y3 @ 28.69/4.20 Y2) => (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y3 @ 28.69/4.20 catalunya)))))) & 28.69/4.20 (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : reg]: 28.69/4.20 (((c @ Y3 @ 28.69/4.20 Y2) => (c @ 28.69/4.20 Y3 @ spain)))))))))))))))))))))), 28.69/4.20 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_3])). 28.69/4.20 thf(zip_derived_cl2446, plain, ($false), 28.69/4.20 inference('eprover', [status(thm)], 28.69/4.20 [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl0, 28.69/4.20 zip_derived_cl8])). 28.69/4.20 28.69/4.20 % SZS output end Refutation 28.69/4.20 28.69/4.20 28.69/4.20 % Terminating... 29.59/4.37 % Runner terminated. 29.59/4.40 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 29.59/4.40 EOF